My policy
about the Projects submitted for grading:
1. Originality of
submitted work
You may work alone or with one
other student. In either case, for the
purposes of this policy, you will be considered as part of a "group",
consisting either of one person (yourself) or two people (yourself and
a partner). Groups do not
have to be permanent; they may change from one project to another.
Absolutely
no collaboration between groups is allowed. That is, again: no
discussions, no asking questions, nothing. Period. If you
are lost about how to do an exercise and cannot successfully brainstorm
it with your group partner (if any), it suggests that you do not
understand something in the material of the course, or have not read
the project's instructions carefully enough. In this case, you should
come
to the
instructor (me). It is very likely that during our discussion of your
problem, some gaps in your understanding of the material may be
uncovered,
and I will try to help you to mend them.
If you cannot meet with me in person, you may still send
me your questions via e-mail. In such a case, please attach your draft
of the project (preferrably as one black-and-white pdf file and a
Matlab code, if applicable), so that I could see your work. Please make
an effort to state your questions to me clearly.
Violations of the no-collaboration rule
will be
considered violations of academic integrity.
Every instance of a violation, starting with the very first, will be
referred by me to the Center for Student Conduct (CSC). I will follow
the rules described below in recommending to the CSC a penalty to be
imposed to the parties involved. The CSC ultimately decides whether to
follow my recommendation or not.
- The
first
time that I detect collaboration, or any other form of integrity
violation, on (even part of) an
assignment, the imposed penalty will range from 50% (very unlikely) to
150% (more likely) of your
project
grade;
this decision is left entirely up to me.
- In case of the second
violation, I will
recommend that the student(s) be given an XF for the course.
Both
(or all) groups involved in a collaboration will be given the same
penalty. This rule will not be changed under any circumstances.
Also, if one of the groups at fault has two members,
then I will recommend to the CSC that both members be given the same
penalty.
If you disagree with this part of my recommendation, you must petition
the CSC to overrule it and thereby assign different penalties to the
two members of the group.
Example:
Suppose group 1 involves students A and B, and group 2 involves
students C and D. Suppose student D declares to the CSC that student C
had no knowledge of student D being involved in the violation. Then the
sanctions imposed on students A, B, and D will be the same, and those
imposed on student C (if any) will be decided in a consultation of the
CSC with me.
2. Planning ahead your
work on the Projects
Projects are not designed
to be done in one
sitting. Rather, each
project may take as long as 10-12
hours of work.
To digest the material presented in the Projects, as well as to
relate it to the material covered in class, if you need to start
working on the assigned Project well
in advance of its due date.
To
encourage this
practice, I will enforce the following policy on helping you with
questions that you might have about Projects:
1) On the day the Project is due, I
will
answer only minor questions about its content, but will not
provide any substantial help.
2) One academic (i.e., working) day
before the due date, I will provide help only on the last exercise of
the Project. (Please note: In some of the Projects, Exercises may be
called "Parts" or "Steps". These terms all mean the same thing. Ask me
if you have any doubts.)
3) 2 academic days before the due date, I
will provide help only on the last 2 exercises.
4) 3 academic days before
the due date, I will provide help only on the last 3 exercises.; etc.
5) Also, suppose that the last
exercise
is substantially based on the first one, and you ask me about it one
day before the Project is due, but have not done exercise 1. I
will help
you with those issues in the last exercise that are related to
exercise 1 only under the
condition that you will agree to receive a score of zero for
exercise 1. (Or, if you have already done some meaningful work for
exercise 1 but still have gaps in it that prevent you from doing later
exercises, the "score of zero" in the previous sentence will be
replaced by the current score at the moment that I agree to help you.)
However, under no circumstances will I "bridge a gap" consisting of
more than one exercise... I know this much explanation may sound
confusing
:-). Ask me if you need a
clarification.
To
summarize:
Plan
ahead, plan ahead, plan ahead ... Lack of planning by you will not
constitute an emergency for me.