Generative AI, such as
ChatGPT (or any other), can probably do any of the homework problems. You are not allowed to use any help
from AI or any other outside source. All
information that you need to successfully do any of the homework
problems is
found in their Instructions and the posted lecture Notes.
If you have
difficulty following those
instructions, you should seek help from the instructor rather than from
any source outside of this class. If you cannot meet with me in person,
you may (and
should!) send
me your questions via e-mail. In such a case, please attach a scan of your work and make
an effort to state your questions to me.
Even though all homework problems can be done
following the steps outlined in the posled lectures (possibly for a
similar problem), it is still likely that you may occasionally search
for some information online. If in your submittted solution you end up
using an idea explained elsewhere, you must:
(i) give a reference to the website where you have found that information, and
(ii) be able to explain to me every nuance of that technique.
Failure to do either of these will be considered an academic integrity violation and entail consequences described below.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- B -
You may work with other students within
the limitations described below. You may
figure out an idea to
the solution, but not
the entire solution, of a problem. That is, the details of your submitted
solution must be worked out by
you without using or consulting any
outside source (see above).
By "details" above, I do not mean cosmetic differences in notations or
free-form answers, but steps showing your original calculations.
The homework assignments are essentially based on the material
of the lectures. In many cases, a homework problem requires you to
follow the guidelines presented in the lectures in a slightly different
setting. Therefore, if you do not know how to do a problem, you must be
not
understanding the material of the lecture. In this case, you should
come to the
instructor for help, rather than brainstorm the problem with your
classmates.
(See also the 2nd paragraph in part A above.)
Let's take
# 1(a) of HW 1 to illustrate the concept of allowed versus
non-allowed collaboration. Suppose you don't know how to begin finding
T(alpha) and ask a
classmate for help. An allowed answer
would be to point you to a place
in the notes where a similar calculation is done. The classmate may
also explain to you any of the derivations in the notes that you do not
understand. A non-allowed
answer would be to tell you what steps you
should do to compute T(alpha).
Of course,
the above example cannot describe all possible scenarios. You should
use the following "rule of thumb": your collaboration with your
classmates should be "point-like".
That is, if there are isolated
points in a problem which you cannot do -- go ahead and ask. If,
however, you (or your classmate) notice that the entire exercise becomes
a continuous sequence of such "points" (in other words, an obstacle
course), then you must be missing something important from the material
and should ask the instructor for help, rather than continuing to work
with your classmates. If you need any clarification to the above
-- please ask me.
In some (but not all!) cases I can determine that the students have worked together and tried
to do their original work as described above, but came too close to a
violation. (Note: this determination, as well as what "tried" and "too
close" mean, are left entirely up to me in any given case!) Then, I
will treat it as a mistake rather than a violation, will summon all
involved students to meet with me within 2 business days, and will
explain where they have come too close to a violation. There will be no
further consequences for the students in this instance. (Note again: I
may proceed to treating this situation as an academic violation right
away; whether to do so or have a conversation with the students first,
is left entirely up to me.)
If any of the involved students if found to be in a similar situation
again, I will treat it as a violation of academic integrity with the
consequences described in the next paragraph.
Violations of the above rules will be
considered academic cheating.
The
first instance of it
will result in a report to the Center for Student Conduct (CSC) and a
score between one half and `negative one' of the weight of
this entire assignment (see below) -- even if illegal collaboration was
detected only on part of it.
Example 1:
Students A and B have been found to illegally collaborate on 1
problem on an assignment that contains 5 problems and whose total
weight is 4% of the course final grade. Their grade for this assignment
will then be between 2% and -4 [minus four] %. If violation
is indeed detected only in 1
problem, and all other problems clearly
show the students' own work, I may (but am not under any obligation to)
consider assigning the grade between 2% and 0%, i.e. in the
higher
range.
Example 2:
Students C and D (or another Student E) have been found to commit academic violation of any sort on 2
problems on the same assignment. Their grade for this assignment will
be -4 [minus four] %. (To clarify: this is a negative amount added to the final grade, equivalently bringing it down by 8 %.)
Both
the
person/group who copied the other person''s work and the
person whose work was copied will be given the same penalty.
After the second
instances of academic cheating, I will recommend to the CSC that
the students be given the grade of XF for the course. This will occur regardless of how minor the violation is (e.g., even if it is only on one problem).