Instructions for turning in an extra
credit
assignment
The purpose of the extra credit
assignment is to keep you
challenged if you find the regular assignment too easy, or if you want
to learn the material at a deeper level than normally covered in class.
Therefore, I discourage
you from doing an extra credit assignment if you have difficulty
completing the regular homework. In the latter case, you need to see
the instructor for help; otherwise, you will most likely receive low
grades for quizzes and tests.
In order to have your extra
credit assignment graded, (i)
you must also turn in your regular homework for
the same section, and (ii)
this regular homework must be at least 70%
correct. I will not grade
this regular homework, but only mark mistakes that you have made (if
any). Both your extra credit work and regular homework must be written
neatly and stapled. I will
not accept it if it is sloppily prepared.
As with the regular homework, you are encouraged
to seek help of the
instructor with this additional homework. However, since this brings
you extra credit, I
will only give you a hint, but will not guide you through the entire
solution, as I
normally would do with a regular homework problem.
When doing an extra credit assignment, you may also seek help of tutors
or work together with a classmate. (See
a clarification after this paragraph.) Keep in mind,
however, that this
will be beneficial to you only if you understand the solution
and, most importantly, are able to
repeat it on your own. I will check, at my
discretion, whether you can do so by asking you to repeat the solution.
If you are unable to clearly explain to me the solution of the extra
credit problem you had
handed in, this will be considered academic
cheating. As such, it will be reported to the UVM Center for
Student Conduct. In
addition, the first
instance of it
will result in an appropriate (at my discretion) reduction
of your final grade (by between 5 and 7%). The second instance will
result in an XF for the course. No exceptions
will be made from this policy.
Given the accessibility of Generative AI, which can generate detailed,
step-by-step solutions to, probably, any of the assigned problems, you
should expect that I will be summonning everyone submitting an extra
credit assignment for the first three--five submissions, until I know
you well enough (and, of course, can continue to do so afterwards at my
sole discretion), to check whether you can repeat the solution on your
own.
Clarification
on how I will handle collaborative extra-credit
work:
If
you work with your classmate(s) as a group, you may just submit one
solution and put all your names on it. (However, each group member must
also submit their regular homework, as described above.) Then I
will divide the added points by the number of people in the group. This
will still add bonus points to your final grade, of course; just fewer
of them than if you had done the work all by yourself. If you have
collaborated only on a subset of extra-credit problems, the above
"division rule" will apply only to those problems which you will
indicate on the front page. (Example:
John and Mary did one extra-credit problem together and, in addition,
John did one problem by himself and Mary did two by herself. They
submit their separate works but indicate which problem they have
collaborated on. Suppose each problem is worth 1 point. Then John gets
0.5+1=1.5, and Mary 0.5+2=2.5, bonus points.)
If two or more students submit essentially the same solutions that have merely
cosmetic differences (at my discretion) and fails to acknowledge
collaboration, then for the first time, I will divide the total bonus
score by twice the
number of people who, in my opinion, have collaborated. This will be
regardless of how many problems they have collaborated on. Please note: Each person in the group is still responsible for being able to clearly explain to me the solution. Failure to do so by even one student in the collaborating group will entail - for everyone
in the collaborating group - the consequences described two paragraphs
above (and, of course, no extra credit will be given to anyone in the
group).
If a submission of merely cosmetically different works occurs for the
second time by a given student, I will not give extra credit but will, instead, treat this
as the 1st instance of academic cheating (see
above) for every member of the collaborating group. I.e., in this case
I will not even go to the lengths of checking if any student
understood the submitted solutions and will report the entire group to the Center for Student Conduct. A repeated submission of merely cosmetically different works will be treated as a 2nd instance of academic cheating (see above).
If you are unsure about any of these
rules, ask me before submitting your work.